Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor bug fixes for XMR tx proof feature #4490

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 7, 2020
Merged

Minor bug fixes for XMR tx proof feature #4490

merged 1 commit into from Sep 7, 2020

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Sep 7, 2020

  • SellerStep3View was retrieving the currency name rather than currency code. This caused failure to ever display the Auto-confirm status field.
  • useXmrTxProof flag was used before initialization in cases where addContent() is called before activate().
  • Fix missing CSS color code xmr-orange, was missing from dark mode.
  • Fix log message spelling/typo errors.
  • Remove address validator from XMR service address settings because it does not support https prefix.

[edit] @chimp1984 wants to work on SellerStep3View.java so I have removed it from this PR.

chimp1984
chimp1984 previously approved these changes Sep 7, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@chimp1984 chimp1984 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Fix missing CSS color code xmr-orange, was missing from dark mode.

Fix log message spelling/typo errors.

Removed 2 fixes from SellerStep3View so that chimp1984 can make
changes.

Remove address validator from XMR service address settings because
it does not support https prefix.
Copy link
Contributor

@ripcurlx ripcurlx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK based on #4490 (review)

@ripcurlx ripcurlx merged commit 38cff29 into bisq-network:master Sep 7, 2020
@ripcurlx ripcurlx added this to the v1.3.8 milestone Sep 7, 2020
@ghost ghost mentioned this pull request Sep 21, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants