Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For Cycle 27 #887

Closed
wallclockbuilder opened this issue Aug 1, 2021 · 10 comments
Closed

For Cycle 27 #887

wallclockbuilder opened this issue Aug 1, 2021 · 10 comments
Assignees
Labels
parsed:valid https://bisq.wiki/Compensation#Ensure_your_request_is_valid team:dev https://bisq.wiki/Dev_Team was:rejected Indicates that a compensation request was rejected by DAO voting
Milestone

Comments

@wallclockbuilder
Copy link

wallclockbuilder commented Aug 1, 2021

Summary

  • BSQ requested: 502.44
  • USD requested: 618.00
  • BSQ rate: 1.23 USD per BSQ

Contributions delivered

Cycle 23

Title Team USD Link Notes
Replace slack with Keybase dev 5 5288 PR
Release v1.6.0 dev 441 Report Testing
Release v1.6.1 dev 0 Report Testing
Improve takeoffer error handing dev 17 5294 Code Review
Fix dark mode readibility of specific texts - Part 2 dev 7 5332 Code Review
Delete issue template file dev 0 5353 Code Review
Remove the apparent link for cases where the trade is not available for mediators dev 37 5354 Code Review
Add api method createcryptopaymentacct dev 28 5356 Code Review
Allow default fee values in leniency check dev 21 5365 Code Review
Fix NPE in Portfolio View when market price n/a dev 31 5385 Code Review
Update commands for mediator/refund agent dev 22 5323 Merged PR
Fix typo in function name dev 9 5291 Merged PR
Replace slack with Keybase dev 0 5288 Merged PR
Transaction Details dialog should display exact amount of BTC sent. No more. No less. dev 0 5305 Issue leading to Merged PR

Contributions in progress

Title Team USD Link Notes
Update testing steps. dev - 5317 -
Change file mentioned to from .desktop to .service dev - 5319 -
Generate more than 1 block(regtest) dev - 5355 -
Add tooltip(on hover) to BondUnlockTime column title dev - 5275 -
Temporary solution for high mining fees dev - 5282 -
Publish ALL pending offers when mining fee is low. dev - 5296 -
Unhide custom mining fee option(from settings-page to send-bitcoin-page) dev - 5298 -
Unhide custom mining fee option for sending BSQ dev - 5304 -
Let user enter human friendly time for locking up BSQ. Let Bisq handle the conversion to block time. dev - 5306 -
@ghost ghost added the parsed:invalid https://bisq.wiki/Compensation#Ensure_your_request_is_valid label Aug 1, 2021
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 1, 2021

Errors

USD amount not specified in summary section
BSQ amount not specified in summary section
No compensation lineitems found.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 1, 2021

Info

Read BSQ amount from summary: 283.49
Read USD amount from summary: 618
Read BSQ rate from summary: 2.18
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":5}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":441}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":0}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":17}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":7}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":0}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":37}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":28}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":21}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":31}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":22}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":9}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":0}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":0}

Errors

Incorrect BSQ rate specified: 2.18, expected: 1.23
ERROR: Total BSQ does not match the sum of line items:

  • Summary total: 283.49 BSQ
  • Calculated total: 502.44 BSQ

@ghost ghost added the team:dev https://bisq.wiki/Dev_Team label Aug 1, 2021
@wallclockbuilder
Copy link
Author

wallclockbuilder commented Aug 1, 2021

Reference: #819

Screen Shot 2021-08-01 at 12 31 27 PM

@wallclockbuilder wallclockbuilder changed the title For Cycle 26 For Cycle 27 Aug 15, 2021
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 15, 2021

Info

Read BSQ amount from summary: 283.49
Read USD amount from summary: 618
Read BSQ rate from summary: 2.18
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":5}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":441}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":0}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":17}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":7}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":0}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":37}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":28}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":21}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":31}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":22}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":9}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":0}
Parsed lineitem: {"team":"dev","amount":0}

Errors

Incorrect BSQ rate specified: 2.18, expected: 1.23
ERROR: Total BSQ does not match the sum of line items:

  • Summary total: 283.49 BSQ
  • Calculated total: 502.44 BSQ

@wallclockbuilder
Copy link
Author

Reference: #887 (comment)

@MwithM MwithM added this to the Cycle 27 milestone Aug 16, 2021
@ghost ghost added parsed:valid https://bisq.wiki/Compensation#Ensure_your_request_is_valid and removed parsed:invalid https://bisq.wiki/Compensation#Ensure_your_request_is_valid labels Aug 16, 2021
@wallclockbuilder
Copy link
Author

Tx ID: b7676812f3b62f274b6cb06cddf64c49fe23568f8a830ca8d4b2a878b70ff7c5

@ripcurlx
Copy link
Contributor

@wallclockbuilder Sorry for my late review as I had personal issues. Unfortunately I won't be able to complete the review for this cycle. Still I'll respond to this issue for documentation purpose latest tomorrow. I saw that you published your CR already so I'll try to review it in-time for everyone else to vote on. But worst-case you have to re-submit it in the next cycle.

@ripcurlx
Copy link
Contributor

@wallclockbuilder For your v1.6.0 release test report. Could you please post here the export of your test payment accounts (fiat and alt) as you tested all of them. It would help other devs setting up all of them manually. Also in this test report it says you tested all trading test cases on Testnet (which is not possible, as it is not running anymore). How did you test this?

@ripcurlx
Copy link
Contributor

Code Reviews:

@ bisq-network/bisq#5365: For contributors without a track record I don't think it is a good precedent to compensate a utACK.

In general I think to ask for code review compensation without contributing to the codebase first (more than fixing typos) would send the wrong signal for future CR code reviews (what would prevent someone just to utACK/ACK every PR and ask for compensation without doing anything)

@MwithM MwithM added the was:rejected Indicates that a compensation request was rejected by DAO voting label Aug 29, 2021
@MwithM
Copy link
Contributor

MwithM commented Aug 29, 2021

Closed as rejected.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
parsed:valid https://bisq.wiki/Compensation#Ensure_your_request_is_valid team:dev https://bisq.wiki/Dev_Team was:rejected Indicates that a compensation request was rejected by DAO voting
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants