-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fee reimbursement for trade 02645125 #139
Comments
Can you ask in such cases both parties if they have the latest versions? |
@cbeams could you please assist here. The deposit transaction seems valid to me, when I track its inputs it references the maker/taker txids. I might be looking at it wrong though. |
Good catch, @KanoczTomas. It looks like I incorrectly cancelled this trade as failed. In any case, we should still go ahead with reimbursing both maker and taker transactions given that this was my mistake and that the trade actually could have been completed. |
Closing as reimbursed via the batch transaction documented at #101 (comment). |
Maker: ad9f280a88e0e3fe0c9394ed37d6d5e1c94f6393914bfcb137847d61e728a4df
Taker: c360ff3e0df5fbf91a1a9232c671ef1b03692fa614a0fa3326865210385636b2
Deposit: 6d59fb1cb9bc59e82694b5f0f1c405e9fc09f8579927c09d1819410ea6179c09
Buyer's maker fee transaction was not broadcast. Seller's lost taker fees will be reimbursed in #101.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: