Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[bitnami/clickhouse] Clickhouse keeper replace zookeeper as independent pod #31597

Open
402309718 opened this issue Jan 27, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
clickhouse feature-request on-hold Issues or Pull Requests with this label will never be considered stale

Comments

@402309718
Copy link

Name and Version

bitnami/clickhouse

What is the problem this feature will solve?

Help improve the scalability of ClickHouse - Keeper. Currently, the keeper is embedded in the server. When scaling out, having more keepers is unnecessary.

What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem?

You can refer to the deployment pattern of ZooKeeper and simply replace ZooKeeper with ClickHouse - Keeper.

What alternatives have you considered?

No response

@github-actions github-actions bot added the triage Triage is needed label Jan 27, 2025
@javsalgar javsalgar changed the title Clickhouse keeper replace zookeeper as independent pod [bitnami/clickhouse] Clickhouse keeper replace zookeeper as independent pod Jan 27, 2025
@javsalgar
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

Thank you so much for the feature request. I will forward it to the team but we cannot guarantee an ETA. If you want to speed up the process, you can submit a PR and the team will check it.

@javsalgar javsalgar added the on-hold Issues or Pull Requests with this label will never be considered stale label Jan 27, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the triage Triage is needed label Jan 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
clickhouse feature-request on-hold Issues or Pull Requests with this label will never be considered stale
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants