Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Any chance of licensing this under Apache 2.0? #14

Closed
kerlyn-bsd3 opened this issue Jan 4, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #15
Closed

Any chance of licensing this under Apache 2.0? #14

kerlyn-bsd3 opened this issue Jan 4, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #15

Comments

@kerlyn-bsd3
Copy link

What is the problem this feature will solve?

AFAICT, bitnami charts and containers files are licensed under Apache2.0. Having the odd GPL'd component makes it more difficult to use the bitnami project.

What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem?

Re-license under Apache 2.0

What alternatives have you considered?

No response

@marcosbc
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @kerlyn-bsd3, thanks for the suggestion!

After some checking, it seems like these are the only tools in the Bitnami org licensed as GPL: gonit, ini-file, render-template and wait-for-port.

Given that we have standarized on using Apache 2.0 across all our other projects (except forks), we agree that it makes sense to re-license those projects to that license, and we are already working on it!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants