A Model-Driven Deep Neural Network for Single Image Rain Removal (CVPR'2020)
@inproceedings{wang2020model,
title={A model-driven deep neural network for single image rain removal},
author={Wang, Hong and Xie, Qi and Zhao, Qian and Meng, Deyu},
booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},
pages={3103--3112},
year={2020}
}
Quantitative Result
The metrics are PSNR/SSIM
. Both are evaluated on RGB channels.
Method | Rain200L | Rain200H | Rain800 | Rain1200 | Rain1400 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
rcdnet_c32s17n4 | 39.14/0.986 | 29.43/0.900 | 27.75/0.872 | 32.62/0.917 | 31.28/0.919 |
Network Complexity
Input shape | Flops | Params |
---|---|---|
(3, 256, 256) | 194.54GFlops | 2.97M |
Help Wanted
The results obtained from
test.py
deviates from the true value. It is speculated that the network weights has not been saved correctly. The experimental results given above are from the evaluation process of the last epoch (by checking log files). The evaluation process, which is called fromEvalHook
, differs from the testing process oftest.py
in that it loads the network weights in memory directly, without going through the serialization process.
- Updated on 2022.4.6: Seems that it's not the issue of saving weights. Quite confused now.