Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comparison of performance between SReC and other "highly compressed formats" #6

Closed
DonaldTsang opened this issue Apr 10, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@DonaldTsang
Copy link

DonaldTsang commented Apr 10, 2020

Please take a look at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ju4q1WkaXT7WoxZINmQpf4ElgMD2VMlqeDN2DuZ6yJ8/edit
Google and FLIF has recently published a new image format, JPEG-XL, as a replacement to PNG.
Others have also made similar formats, namely AVIF, HEIF, WebP and BPG.

It might be fun to test out the compression ratio and time of SReC in comparison to others.
However is that it should use "clean" PNG instead of JPEG since JXL is strong for preserving artifacts.

@caoscott
Copy link
Owner

I think this is interesting but unfortunately I don't have the time to support this at the moment. I would encourage you to try it yourself on the Open Images test set. The test set Images should already be cleaned of JPEG artifacts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants