Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add missing surface upwelling radiative flux in the longwave for use in CMIP7 #236

Closed
fmoconnor opened this issue Nov 12, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
accepted Agreed for inclusion in the next release of the standard name table or other controlled vocabulary CMIP7 Vocabulary proposals for CMIP7 variables standard name (added by template) Requests and discussions for standard names and other controlled vocabulary

Comments

@fmoconnor
Copy link

Following on from the discussion in #58, we identified a missing CF name in the diagnosis of surface upwelling longwave radiative fluxes, from a diagnostic call to a model's radiation scheme under clear-sky and "clean", i.e., no aerosol conditions.

From that discussion, LW emission from the surface is based on temperature and thus the same for all-sky vs clear-sky since the clear-sky calculation is not actually interactively changing surface temperature. However, when models treat surface emissivity less than 1, some of the downwelling LW from the lower atmosphere to the surface is not perfectly absorbed and instead will be reflected (i.e., <1 emissivity implies >0 reflectivity). This reflection is then included as part of the longwave upwelling diagnosis and the amount reflected is dependent on the amount of downwelling, which in turn is dependent on if/where there is a cloud above.

It means that the all-sky vs clear-sky radiation calculation would be impacted. It also means that in the case of any atmospheric constituent that absorbs and/or scatters in the longwave, there will be differences in radiative flux diagnostics from any corresponding double radiation call between all-sky and clear-sky conditions. Therefore, there is a requirement for a corresponding CF name for the surface upwelling radiative flux from a diagnostic radiation call assuming clear-sky conditions and "no aerosol" (i.e., surface_upwelling_longwave_flux_in_air_assuming_clear_sky_and_no_aerosol).

Therefore, this issue has been opened in order to propose this new addition to the CF standard.

Proposer's name Fiona O'Connor

Date 12 November 2024

- Term surface_upwelling_longwave_flux_in_air_assuming_clear_sky_and_no_aerosol

- Description The surface called "surface" means the lower boundary of the atmosphere. The term "longwave" means longwave radiation. Upwelling radiation is radiation from below. It does not mean "net upward". The sign convention is that "upwelling" is positive upwards and "downwelling" is positive downwards. When thought of as being incident on a surface, a radiative flux is sometimes called "irradiance". In addition, it is identical with the quantity measured by a cosine-collector light-meter and sometimes called "vector irradiance". In accordance with common usage in geophysical disciplines, "flux" implies per unit area, called "flux density" in physics. A phrase assuming_condition indicates that the named quantity is the value which would obtain if all aspects of the system were unaltered except for the assumption of the circumstances specified by the condition. "Clear sky" means in the absence of clouds.

- Units W/m2

@fmoconnor fmoconnor added add to cfeditor (added by template) Moderators are requested to add this proposal to the CF editor standard name (added by template) Requests and discussions for standard names and other controlled vocabulary labels Nov 12, 2024
Copy link

Thank you for your proposal. These terms will be added to the cfeditor (http://cfeditor.ceda.ac.uk/proposals/1) shortly. Your proposal will then be reviewed and commented on by the community and Standard Names moderator.

@feggleton feggleton added the CMIP7 Vocabulary proposals for CMIP7 variables label Dec 5, 2024
@feggleton feggleton removed the add to cfeditor (added by template) Moderators are requested to add this proposal to the CF editor label Dec 13, 2024
@japamment japamment added the accept within 7 days Starts 7 day countdown to accept a change to standard names or other controlled vocabulary label Jan 15, 2025
@japamment
Copy link
Member

Thank you for proposing this additional name @fmoconnor.

The name, units and definition all look fine. This proposal is consistent with the one in #58 that has already been accepted and published in v86 of the standard name table. Therefore I think there is no need for additional discussion here and unless further comments are received in the next few days, this name will be accepted and published in the next update to the standard name table on 20th-21st January.

Best wishes,
Alison

@japamment
Copy link
Member

No further comments have been received so this name is now accepted for publication in the standard name table:

surface_upwelling_longwave_flux_in_air_assuming_clear_sky_and_no_aerosol
Units: W m-2
Description: The surface called "surface" means the lower boundary of the atmosphere. The term "longwave" means longwave radiation. Upwelling radiation is radiation from below. It does not mean "net upward". The sign convention is that "upwelling" is positive upwards and "downwelling" is positive downwards. When thought of as being incident on a surface, a radiative flux is sometimes called "irradiance". In addition, it is identical with the quantity measured by a cosine-collector light-meter and sometimes called "vector irradiance". In accordance with common usage in geophysical disciplines, "flux" implies per unit area, called "flux density" in physics. A phrase assuming_condition indicates that the named quantity is the value which would obtain if all aspects of the system were unaltered except for the assumption of the circumstances specified by the condition. "Clear sky" means in the absence of clouds.

@japamment japamment added accepted Agreed for inclusion in the next release of the standard name table or other controlled vocabulary and removed accept within 7 days Starts 7 day countdown to accept a change to standard names or other controlled vocabulary labels Jan 20, 2025
@japamment
Copy link
Member

The name in this issue has been published in v89 of the standard name table so closing this one now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
accepted Agreed for inclusion in the next release of the standard name table or other controlled vocabulary CMIP7 Vocabulary proposals for CMIP7 variables standard name (added by template) Requests and discussions for standard names and other controlled vocabulary
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants