You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While commenting the documentation it seems to make some logical sense for the beginAtZero, reverse, suggestedMin and suggestedMax options be moved up a level as they define the scale in general not just the tick labels. This would allow for less nesting for some of these basic features. Also it would be easier to document the ticks option array as specifically controlling the display properties of the tick labels. For example ticks.beginAtZero is still important even if ticks.show = false; as it effects the grid and the entire display of the chart; that seems to break a proverbial bubble around each option set.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@wcatron I agree with separating those settings out. I think at one point we had the scale config something like the one below. I'm not entirely sure why we moved away from that.
While commenting the documentation it seems to make some logical sense for the
beginAtZero
,reverse
,suggestedMin
andsuggestedMax
options be moved up a level as they define the scale in general not just the tick labels. This would allow for less nesting for some of these basic features. Also it would be easier to document theticks
option array as specifically controlling the display properties of the tick labels. For exampleticks.beginAtZero
is still important even ifticks.show = false;
as it effects the grid and the entire display of the chart; that seems to break a proverbial bubble around each option set.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: