Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

why the baseline accuracy is much less than regular resnet on cifar100? #4

Open
JiyueWang opened this issue May 1, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@JiyueWang
Copy link

JiyueWang commented May 1, 2020

https://github.com/weiaicunzai/pytorch-cifar100
resnet34 got 23.24 error rate
and much higher in self distillation
https://github.com/luanyunteng/pytorch-be-your-own-teacher

@chxy95
Copy link
Owner

chxy95 commented May 3, 2020

@JiyueWang
Maybe there are some hyperparameters or implemented details are different.
This repo achieve the considerable performance compared with the DML paper,
so I didn't pay more attention on the architecture or tuning parameters.
Personally,I suggest you can focus more on the idea of DML rather than network.
If you really care about this problem or have strong interest in this work,
I strongly recommended you to use DML in your own task and dataset.

Even so, welcome to tell me if you solve this problem or you have some other discovery.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants