You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If I have BDD A over variables v1..v50 and BDD B over variables v51..v100, then I believe A & B reduces to a sort of concatenation: all edges from A pointing to 1 should now point to v51. I don't think this is how it is implemented as it takes a surprisingly long time in some cases to compute A & B with this property. I apologize in advance if I'm not taking into account some nuance of the data structure that's shared between BDDs.
Is it challenging to add this optimization?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a feature request.
If I have BDD A over variables v1..v50 and BDD B over variables v51..v100, then I believe A & B reduces to a sort of concatenation: all edges from A pointing to 1 should now point to v51. I don't think this is how it is implemented as it takes a surprisingly long time in some cases to compute A & B with this property. I apologize in advance if I'm not taking into account some nuance of the data structure that's shared between BDDs.
Is it challenging to add this optimization?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: