Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Autoparagraphing empty roots should not trigger for transparent batches #3305

Closed
scofalik opened this issue Jul 13, 2017 · 0 comments · Fixed by ckeditor/ckeditor5-paragraph#27
Closed

Autoparagraphing empty roots should not trigger for transparent batches #3305

scofalik opened this issue Jul 13, 2017 · 0 comments · Fixed by ckeditor/ckeditor5-paragraph#27
Assignees
@scofalik
Labels
package:paragraph type:bug This issue reports a buggy (incorrect) behavior.
Milestone
iteration 11

Comments

@scofalik
Copy link
Contributor

Autoparagraphing empty roots should not trigger for transparent batches.
@scofalik scofalik self-assigned this Jul 13, 2017
@scofalik scofalik changed the title Autoparagraphing should not trigger for transparent batches Autoparagraphing empty roots should not trigger for transparent batches Jul 13, 2017
Reinmar referenced this issue in ckeditor/ckeditor5-paragraph Jul 13, 2017
@Reinmar
Merge pull request #27 from ckeditor/t/26
a171de3 
Fix: Autoparagraphing empty roots will not be triggered if the change-to-fix was in a `transparent` batch. Closes #26.
@mlewand mlewand transferred this issue from ckeditor/ckeditor5-paragraph Oct 9, 2019
@mlewand mlewand added this to the iteration 11 milestone Oct 9, 2019
@mlewand mlewand added status:confirmed type:bug This issue reports a buggy (incorrect) behavior. package:paragraph labels Oct 9, 2019
@scofalik scofalik mentioned this issue Oct 11, 2019
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@scofalik scofalik

Labels
package:paragraph type:bug This issue reports a buggy (incorrect) behavior.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
iteration 11
2 participants
@scofalik @mlewand