resource/access_group: pass group conditions via TransformAccessGroupForSchema
#918
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jacobbednarz
force-pushed
the
run-access-group-through-transformer
branch
from
2f74712 to
ef63251
Compare
jacobbednarz
force-pushed
the
run-access-group-through-transformer
branch
from
ef63251 to
f206a85
Compare
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Off the back of #917, this is another fix to ensure the state is able to be
compared against the remote API to correctly identify drift.
To be a good citizen, I've also swapped these
d.Setcalls to handle errorchecking to prevent silent failures from slipping through.
Depends on #917
Fixes #891