Agreements & Disclosures

[adamavenir]

Agreements

If you are a C4 Certified Contributor by commenting or interacting with this repo prior to public release of the contest report, you agree that you have read the Certified Warden docs and agree to be bound by:

• C4 Certified Contributor Terms and Conditions,
• C4 Code of Professional Conduct, and
• the disclosure guidelines below.

To signal your agreement to these terms, add a 👍 emoji to this issue.

Code4rena staff reserves the right to disqualify anyone from this role and similar future opportunities who is unable to participate within the above guidelines.

Disclosures

Sponsors may elect to add team members and contractors to assist in sponsor review and triage. All sponsor representatives added to the repo should comment on this issue to identify themselves.

To ensure contest integrity, the following potential conflicts of interest should also be disclosed with a comment in this issue:

1. any sponsor staff or sponsor contractors who are also participating as wardens
2. any wardens hired to assist with sponsor review (and thus presenting sponsor viewpoint on findings)
3. any wardens who have a relationship with a judge that would typically fall in the category of potential conflict of interest (family, employer, business partner, etc)
4. any other case where someone might reasonably infer a possible conflict of interest.

[0age]

Adding the following disclosure:

• OpenSea has engaged Spearbit to review the Seaport codebase, particularly in regards to assisting with implementation of fixes related to findings from the Seaport code4rena competition, as well as to incentivize Spearbit to participate in the competition.
• @MrToph, @leonardoalt, @axic, @hrkrshnn, @gpersoon, @naps62, and @Thro77le will be participating in the review, and most of them also participated in the code4rena competition as wardens (either as part of the Spearbit team or as individuals).
• We are confident that each of these reviewers will engage with this repository with impartiality and professionalism, and will not attempt to influence the judges or the review process in any way — they will refrain from actively commenting on findings and will simply utilize the repository for viewing findings and assisting in implementing and reviewing their fixes where relevant.