You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue tracks the implementation of a PoC to validate the path forward for #128.
To support #185, we must be able to figure out if a cached layer image is valid, given the state of files relevant to building the container (think contents of Dockerfile, devcontainer.json, and hashes of any files pulled in via COPY-directive).
In this PoC, we will implement this logic (files -> layer) as a subcommand of envbulider. This will require parsing and understanding of Dockerfile to understand if a change modifies the outcome, and which layers remain intact.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
With a few changes, Kaniko can report the hash for directives in the Dockerfile
Example: A directive like COPY ./file /file consists of two hashes, the actual directive (COPY ./file /file) and the hash of the ./file. The hash we're referring to is a combination of these two.
The 1. solution is fairly straight forward and has been demonstrated in #213.
The 2. solution can be more flexible (doesn't require reproducible builds), but would need to develop a way to map hash + hash + hash -> final image. This would means tagging the image with a custom tag (perhaps a combination of all build layer hashes).
This issue tracks the implementation of a PoC to validate the path forward for #128.
To support #185, we must be able to figure out if a cached layer image is valid, given the state of files relevant to building the container (think contents of
Dockerfile
,devcontainer.json
, and hashes of any files pulled in viaCOPY
-directive).In this PoC, we will implement this logic (files -> layer) as a subcommand of envbulider. This will require parsing and understanding of
Dockerfile
to understand if a change modifies the outcome, and which layers remain intact.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: