We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We are skipping x64 Python 2.7 due to failing tests. See #16, #16 (comment), and https://ci.appveyor.com/project/conda-forge/protobuf-feedstock/build/1.0.58/job/3wp2baqcaws8u63c
We should keep on eye upstream as that will probably be fixed in a new release.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Comment from @jjhelmus:
I found a number of reports of failing unit tests on Windows with protobuf 3.1.0, protocolbuffers/protobuf#2548, protocolbuffers/protobuf#2238 and protocolbuffers/protobuf#2408. It has been suggested that this may be cause by a "\r\n" vs. "\n" problem and the failures can be ignored.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
We are skipping x64 Python 2.7 due to failing tests. See #16, #16 (comment), and https://ci.appveyor.com/project/conda-forge/protobuf-feedstock/build/1.0.58/job/3wp2baqcaws8u63c
We should keep on eye upstream as that will probably be fixed in a new release.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: