We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Now with the changes to governance and groups module in SDK v0.46, I think we can switch the governance proposals in IBC into regular msgs.
The messages will only succeed if they are signed by an approved list of senders that can be a parameter of IBC.
This allows us to support the current default behaviour by having the governance module account be one of the approved signers.
But we can also allow governance to delegate this responsibility to trusted groups and add the group account address to the approved sender list.
I believe this would be the preferred approach with SDK v0.46, correct me if im wrong @marbar3778
cc: @ValarDragon since I believe you were the one to bring up the inconvenience of governance-gated IBC recovery solutions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This would be awesome!
Sorry, something went wrong.
same issue as #1282. Do you have a preference to keep this open instead? Your justification for the change makes a lot of sense
I think yours is more structured. Im ok with just copying any relevant rationale into your issue and closing this one thanks!
cool I added some of the addition rationale for allowing of delegation to trusted groups
No branches or pull requests
Now with the changes to governance and groups module in SDK v0.46, I think we can switch the governance proposals in IBC into regular msgs.
The messages will only succeed if they are signed by an approved list of senders that can be a parameter of IBC.
This allows us to support the current default behaviour by having the governance module account be one of the approved signers.
But we can also allow governance to delegate this responsibility to trusted groups and add the group account address to the approved sender list.
I believe this would be the preferred approach with SDK v0.46, correct me if im wrong @marbar3778
cc: @ValarDragon since I believe you were the one to bring up the inconvenience of governance-gated IBC recovery solutions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: