Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Make sure staking module changes work with Liquid Staking #67

Closed
mpoke opened this issue Apr 26, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Make sure staking module changes work with Liquid Staking #67

mpoke opened this issue Apr 26, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
@mpoke
Labels
scope: cosmos-sdk Integration with Cosmos SDK scope: testing Code review, testing, making sure the code is following the specification.

Comments

@mpoke
Copy link
Contributor

mpoke commented Apr 26, 2022

No description provided.

@mpoke mpoke self-assigned this Apr 26, 2022
@mpoke mpoke added scope: testing Code review, testing, making sure the code is following the specification. scope: cosmos-sdk Integration with Cosmos SDK labels Apr 26, 2022
@jtremback
Copy link
Contributor

@mpoke Is this still in question?

Repository owner moved this from Todo to Done in Replicated Security Sep 7, 2022
@jtremback jtremback reopened this Sep 7, 2022
Repository owner moved this from Done to In Progress in Replicated Security Sep 7, 2022
@mpoke
Copy link
Contributor Author

mpoke commented Sep 8, 2022

@mpoke Is this still in question?

Yes. First we we need to wait for our changes to be merged into the SDK, see cosmos/cosmos-sdk#13122.

Repository owner moved this from In Progress to Done in Replicated Security Oct 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mpoke mpoke

Labels
scope: cosmos-sdk Integration with Cosmos SDK scope: testing Code review, testing, making sure the code is following the specification.
Projects
No open projects
Replicated Security
Status: Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jtremback @mpoke