-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
P2058 Make std::random_device Less Inscrutable #786
Comments
P2058R0 Improve Chair: Bryce Adelstein Lelbach Champion: Martin Hořeňovský Minute Taker: Peter Bindels Start Review: 2020-02-10 11:33 I'm not sure what decisions you would make based on the return value of Is Authors should get Walter's input on this. Needs a better name. This probably has to be VERY conservative if it's constexpr; what if you're running on an older OS kernel or older hardware that has bugs? Start Polling: 11:49 POLL: We should promise more committee time to pursuing P2058R0 (make
Attendance: 15 # of Authors: 1 Author Position: SF That has consensus. POLL: Deprecate
Attendance: 15 # of Authors: 1 Author Position: SF That has no consensus. POLL: Knowing what we know right now, implementations should only have
Attendance: 15 # of Authors: 1 Author Position: SF That has no consensus. End: 12:05 CONSENSUS: Further discussion in LEWGI is needed this week. |
P2058R0 Improve Chair: Nevin Liber Champion: Martin Hořeňovský Minute Taker: Marco Foco Start Review: 2020-02-11 13:38 This probably has to be VERY conservative if it's constexpr; what if you're running on an older OS kernel or older hardware that has bugs? Start Polling: 13:56 POLL: Deprecate
Attendance: 19 # of Authors: 1 Author Position: SF That has unanimous consent. End: 13:56 CONSENSUS: We will not pursue P2058R0 (Improve |
P2058R0 Make std::random_device Less Inscrutable (Martin Hořeňovský)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: