You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems that adding support for higher degree polynomials in the undistortion code would be simple, but I'm not sure about the boundary condition - what would this become?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thank you for your interest! I just found out about this recent WACV2022 paper that derives the maximum radius for more complex camera models. The solution is not trivial but they provide a Python implementation and needs to be computed only once per camera, thus can be cached (e.g. adding a Camera.maximum_radius method with @cached_property).
Dear pixloc authors and developers,
Many thanks for providing such a high-quality package! Well done.
For our application, we are using a FULL_OPENCV camera model, which isn't supported by pixloc at the moment.
The FULL_OPENCV model is registered in utils/colmap.py, but it's missing from pixlib/geometry/wrappers.py, as well as from the actual undistortion in pixlib/geometry/utils.py and its jacobian. The FULL_OPENCV calibration model is an extension to the OPENCV model, with an higher-order polynomial: k3, k4, k5 and k6 follow p1 and p2.
It seems that adding support for higher degree polynomials in the undistortion code would be simple, but I'm not sure about the boundary condition - what would this become?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: