-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
render access/vehicle=forestry/agricultural same as vehicle=privat and vehicle=no #671
Comments
The reasoning behind this decision is that usually (in practice) I'm not aware of any tracks that would be dedicated exclusively for agricultural/forestry vehicles and not accessible for pedestrians/bike. The only case I am aware of are actually Happy to reconsider if I'm missing something though. |
Hmm, your interpretation seems to be not in alignment with the wiki and practical tagging habits. In the wiki its quite clearly described, that vehicle=agricultural belongs to all vehicles. If bicycles are not affected, we use motor_vehicle=agricultural. It may depend on the country, but if there is a no vehicle sign with exception for agricultural traffic, normally it also belongs to bicycles. See for example the traffic sign pages for respective countries like Germany or Austria in the wiki. |
vehicle/access=forestry
andvehicle/access=agricultural
are a special case of vehicle/access=private, they only allow certain people to use a track/road.A driving ban (that only allows agricultural or forestry traffic) actually prohibits normal bikes from using a track/street, so imho it should also be rendered in white.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: