WF3 functionality with mathematica

[ipendlet]

Example template for WF3 attached here. The first line of the ExpWorkflowVer== 3 indicates that we are going to be performing a wkflow 3 set of experiments.

2019-05-30T20_58_22.535516+00_00_LBL_WF3_template.xlsx

In the attached example 2,3,4,5 should be sampled from the convex hull while 7 should be able to be a fixed value. In this case the fixed value is set by the second portion of the volume constraints (first constraint: 500,500 and the third is 1000,1000 -- the second constraint is a holdover from when we were dividing the sampling between two portions). The third constraint on a single reagent (in this case the pure chemical DCM) indicates that DCM should always be equal to 1000uL.

Note that there is some added complexity here. There is a new entry in the xlsx interface labeled as exp1_split. This new entry allows the user to specify which chemical/reagent is being held out to the second well site. If used correctly an example output would be as shown here:

https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1aJkflJHmIItcVItY2Kz6f_lsuhnpsafI

There are two separate robot files generated in this run. The one that the robot (hardware responsible for performing the experiments) requires is the "RUNME" file. The other file is for parsing by the ESCALATE_report functionality. This separation must be maintained.

The objective is to have the sampling of the first set of chemicals (excluding DCM) able to be sampled using mathematica while maintaining the hold out case of DCM in the separate vial sites of the RUNME file. In the best case situation we would be able to specify that any single chemical portion of the reaction is capable of being a fixed value. \

Side note: This could also be a good opportunity to think about how to have a fixed volume sample for deterministic testing (either a random state or by using a preformed numpy array).