Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement super method tear-off closures in the VM #24835

Closed
mhausner opened this issue Nov 5, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Implement super method tear-off closures in the VM #24835

mhausner opened this issue Nov 5, 2015 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
area-vm Use area-vm for VM related issues, including code coverage, and the AOT and JIT backends. closed-obsolete Closed as the reported issue is no longer relevant type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug

Comments

@mhausner
Copy link
Contributor

mhausner commented Nov 5, 2015

The VM still needs to implement tear-off closures for super methods.

All other tear-off functionality is fully supported by the VM.

@mhausner mhausner added the area-vm Use area-vm for VM related issues, including code coverage, and the AOT and JIT backends. label Nov 5, 2015
@mhausner mhausner self-assigned this Nov 5, 2015
@kevmoo kevmoo added type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug and removed type-enhancement labels Mar 1, 2016
@mhausner mhausner added the closed-obsolete Closed as the reported issue is no longer relevant label Feb 6, 2017
@mhausner
Copy link
Contributor Author

mhausner commented Feb 6, 2017

This is obsolte. Generalized tear-offs have been removed from the language spec.

@mhausner mhausner closed this as completed Feb 6, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-vm Use area-vm for VM related issues, including code coverage, and the AOT and JIT backends. closed-obsolete Closed as the reported issue is no longer relevant type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants