Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for PERMISSIVE mode explicitly. #105

Closed
HyukjinKwon opened this issue Mar 16, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Support for PERMISSIVE mode explicitly. #105

HyukjinKwon opened this issue Mar 16, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

After working on modes in JSON data source, I think those modes should also be supported here.

Currently, supported modes are DROPMALFORMED and FAILFAST.

HyukjinKwon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 10, 2016
#105

Currently, this library does not support `PERMISSIVE` parse mode. Similar with JSON data source, this also can be done in the same way with `_corrupt_record`.

This PR adds the support for `PERMISSIVE` mode and make this behaviour consistent with the other data sources supporting parse modes (JSON and CSV data sources.)

Also, this PR adds the support for `_corrupt_record`.

This PR is similar with apache/spark#11756 and apache/spark#11881.

Author: hyukjinkwon <[email protected]>

Closes #107 from HyukjinKwon/ISSUE-105-permissive.
@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member Author

This was fixed in the JIRA.

beluisterql added a commit to beluisterql/spark-xml that referenced this issue Aug 4, 2024
databricks/spark-xml#105

Currently, this library does not support `PERMISSIVE` parse mode. Similar with JSON data source, this also can be done in the same way with `_corrupt_record`.

This PR adds the support for `PERMISSIVE` mode and make this behaviour consistent with the other data sources supporting parse modes (JSON and CSV data sources.)

Also, this PR adds the support for `_corrupt_record`.

This PR is similar with apache/spark#11756 and apache/spark#11881.

Author: hyukjinkwon <[email protected]>

Closes #107 from HyukjinKwon/ISSUE-105-permissive.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant