Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Q: Should under-the-hood file retrieval get an INFO message? #327

Open
adswa opened this issue Feb 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Q: Should under-the-hood file retrieval get an INFO message? #327

adswa opened this issue Feb 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
hackathon metalad hackathon 2023

Comments

@adswa
Copy link
Member

adswa commented Feb 21, 2023

I ran datalad meta-extract on a file that wasn't yet present locally. Just as the docstring said, the command obtained the file content prior to performing the extraction. However, I noticed that there was no information about the fact that the file was retrieved (just a short-lived progress bar that disappeared).
DataLad-core commands that call other intermediate commands (e.g., datalad run's internal get) summarize the actions they took - is it a conscious decision to not have such summaries or INFO messages in metalad output?

@christian-monch
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the issue. No, it is not a conscious decision. And I think we should try to stay consistent with DataLad-core. So the answer would be:

Yes, under-the-hood file retrieval should get an INFO-message

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hackathon metalad hackathon 2023
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants