Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comparison of RAiDER and RADIATE #619

Open
whu-dyf opened this issue Dec 16, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Comparison of RAiDER and RADIATE #619

whu-dyf opened this issue Dec 16, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@whu-dyf
Copy link

whu-dyf commented Dec 16, 2023

image I have used RAiDER and RADIATE to process the same data and observed a difference of approximately 14 mm between their results. Is there any article available that analyzes the performance of RAiDER?

Here is the link to the RADIATE software: https://github.com/TUW-VieVS/RADIATE.git

@whu-dyf
Copy link
Author

whu-dyf commented Dec 16, 2023

It seems that RADIATE results are closer to GNSS ZTD products than RAiDER.

@jlmaurer
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @whu-dyf sorry this has gone a bit stale but thanks for posting the comparison! The absolute delays RAiDER calculates will depend on the maximum integration heights used. It looks like the RAiDER differences are all around the same order of magnitude, which could mean a higher integration height is needed. Do you remember what height you used?

@whu-dyf
Copy link
Author

whu-dyf commented May 1, 2024

I used the same NWM data as input for Raider and Radiate. Both are ERA5 37 pressure levels. The maximum height is 1 hPa, if remember correctly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants