This meeting uses UnSync conventions and takes place on our Discord channel; transcript of actual meeting chat published here. [ charter | meeting archive | schedule ]
Nothing fancy needed; just a wave. This helps us tell whether we have a quorum, interpret silence, hold people accountable, and know who we're collaborating with.
DIDComm Spec v2 was formally finished on Monday. It is now "Working Group Approved," which is as far as a standard goes at DIF. Next steps: errata + begin v3 at IETF.
Please see https://github.com/decentralized-identity/didcomm-usergroup/blob/main/meetings/2022-04-20.md#3-follow-up-on-action-items for some old action items that need closure.
We have 5 open PRs against the didcomm.org repo, not counting Daniel's one about Gossyp that is still a WIP.
@Rodolfo, did you mean for PR #44 to be marked as WIP?
Proposed closure: Please take a minute to review and either vote to merge, or leave a comment requesting changes.
Timo was reviewing Snorre's PR that creates the beginnings of a FAQ, and asked two questions. These are worthy of comment by the larger group.
Proposed closure: Leave your thoughts about the questions.
Daniel Bluhm asked a question here and would like discussion from the user group.
Proposed closure: Please visit the issue and leave your thoughts.
Does anybody have thoughts about how to extend Discover Features to understand attachment formats? Should we just use feature-type = attachment, or do we need more granular feature types, like cred-attach and money-attach and evidence-attach and proof-attach?
Proposed closure: discuss on chat
Did you think this meeting was effective? How could we improve?
Proposed closure: Please leave your ideas in chat.