-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 636
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposal: Migrate to JSR-oriented codebase #4544
Comments
As you say, the sooner we make this move, the sooner we can stabilise the Standard Library, and that would be great for everyone. I'm very much in favour of this. To me, workspaces support in both JSR and the Deno runtime are sufficiently established for the change. I haven't had any issues with workspaces functionality so far. I also think stability in the Standard Library is what is desired by users the most. |
Steps needed for this migration:
|
We plan to do this migration right after Deno CLI 1.43 release (which is scheduled on 4/24). |
The following PRs must be merged right before the JSR cutover: |
JSR cutover didn't happen yet because CLI 1.43 release was postponed to the next week because of performance issue |
We currently convert the existing codebase to JSR oriented codebase and publish the exactly the same thing to both JSR and https://deno.land/std. However this prevents us from doing split versioning of each submodule, and that is the blocker for stabilization of std (We don't stabilize the entire standard libary, but we plan to stabilize it module by module gradually).
I think we should migrate to JSR-oriented code base in the near future, but there are some implications by doing that:
jsr.io/@std
.I personally think we are fine with the above conditions, but does anyone have concerns or objections to it?
related #4600
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: