Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal: Migrate to JSR-oriented codebase #4544

Closed
kt3k opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 5 comments · Fixed by #4650
Closed

Proposal: Migrate to JSR-oriented codebase #4544

kt3k opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 5 comments · Fixed by #4650

Comments

@kt3k
Copy link
Member

kt3k commented Apr 3, 2024

We currently convert the existing codebase to JSR oriented codebase and publish the exactly the same thing to both JSR and https://deno.land/std. However this prevents us from doing split versioning of each submodule, and that is the blocker for stabilization of std (We don't stabilize the entire standard libary, but we plan to stabilize it module by module gradually).

I think we should migrate to JSR-oriented code base in the near future, but there are some implications by doing that:

  • We don't update deno.land/std actively anymore (except security fixes). New features go to jsr.io/@std.
    • This is because if we start the split versioning with JSR oriented codebase, it's difficult to convert it back to single-versioned std.
  • The releases of CLI and STD are decoupled. CLI release and STD release happen independently.

I personally think we are fine with the above conditions, but does anyone have concerns or objections to it?

related #4600

@iuioiua
Copy link
Contributor

iuioiua commented Apr 3, 2024

As you say, the sooner we make this move, the sooner we can stabilise the Standard Library, and that would be great for everyone. I'm very much in favour of this.

To me, workspaces support in both JSR and the Deno runtime are sufficiently established for the change. I haven't had any issues with workspaces functionality so far. I also think stability in the Standard Library is what is desired by users the most.

CC @ry and @rbetts

@kt3k
Copy link
Member Author

kt3k commented Apr 3, 2024

Steps needed for this migration:

@kt3k
Copy link
Member Author

kt3k commented Apr 19, 2024

We plan to do this migration right after Deno CLI 1.43 release (which is scheduled on 4/24).

@iuioiua
Copy link
Contributor

iuioiua commented Apr 24, 2024

@kt3k
Copy link
Member Author

kt3k commented Apr 26, 2024

We plan to do this migration right after Deno CLI 1.43 release (which is scheduled on 4/24).

JSR cutover didn't happen yet because CLI 1.43 release was postponed to the next week because of performance issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants