You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think if we just add section heads as observers it is good enough (don't need to be inlcuded in the management review, even though some have provided feedback in this regard) since they can talk with the authors directly if there is an issue, and guide them in telling them if something would be of public interest. We could add some 'guidance' text in the MRF when adding observers to talk to their section heads about the contents of the MRF before submitting it...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think if we just add section heads as observers it is good enough (don't need to be inlcuded in the management review, even though some have provided feedback in this regard) since they can talk with the authors directly if there is an issue, and guide them in telling them if something would be of public interest. We could add some 'guidance' text in the MRF when adding observers to talk to their section heads about the contents of the MRF before submitting it...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: