You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 2, 2023. It is now read-only.
It is not because of it depends on SequenceEquals in corefx that is not very efficient. Making Starts with efficient is really about making SequenceEquals efficient.
Should StartsWith have an overload that takes an index?
I do not think so (at least - not for performance reasons).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: