Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
Those names would just confuse someone else, who would have their own suggestions.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
I kind of like the proposed keywords, actually. Not sure about "derivation", but agree, still better than "protected". |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
We have these access modifiers in C#:
The compound word access modifier is very clear and understandable. It's related to access and it modifies how this access.
Now let's understand each access modifier without looking at the docs:
private
?The point is that keywords of access modification are not self-explanatory enough. Now let's consider these terms:
The point is the terms used for denoting access modifiers are very vague when it comes to their relations to their true implementations and functionality.
I know after decades of existence, this change might not be possible. But just wanted to give you the feedback. Thanks.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions