You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 22, 2020. It is now read-only.
The majority of the solutions to #1, #2, #3 have similar augmentation pipelines (e.g. grt123, Therapixel, Daniel Hammack, etc.). These pipelines mainly consists of Hounsfield scaling, lung segmentation (#120), CT re-orientation, and other resource consumptive spacial operations such as zoom, rotate, shear, shift, flip, etc.
While the Keras DataGenerator can yield a processed patches via affine transformations, it is inefficient and doesn't work with 3D data.
Expected Behavior
A DataGenerator should enable people to perform data augmentation operations such as zoom, rotate, shear, shift, flip, etc on CT scans
Technical details
extend the DataGenerator to deal with 3D volumetric data such as CT scans
Acceptance criteria
efficiently zoom, rotate, shear, shift, and flip CT scans
NOTE: All PRs must follow the standard PR checklist.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Overview
The majority of the solutions to #1, #2, #3 have similar augmentation pipelines (e.g. grt123, Therapixel, Daniel Hammack, etc.). These pipelines mainly consists of Hounsfield scaling, lung segmentation (#120), CT re-orientation, and other resource consumptive spacial operations such as zoom, rotate, shear, shift, flip, etc.
While the Keras DataGenerator can yield a processed patches via affine transformations, it is inefficient and doesn't work with 3D data.
Expected Behavior
A DataGenerator should enable people to perform data augmentation operations such as zoom, rotate, shear, shift, flip, etc on CT scans
Technical details
Acceptance criteria
NOTE: All PRs must follow the standard PR checklist.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: