Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CHE-1797: Add JPA based SnapshotDao implementation #1937

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 26, 2016

Conversation

voievodin
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Adds a new JPA based implementation of SnapshotDao
Removes namespace from the Snapshot model, as it's stored/retrieved but not used for business logic.
Simplifies implementation of LocalTckRepositories.
Adds TCKs for SnapshotDao and covers local implementation by them.

What issues does this PR fix or reference?

#1797

Tests written?

Yes

@skabashnyuk, @sleshchenko, @akorneta please review

@codenvy-ci
Copy link

Build # 1299 - FAILED

Please check console output at http://ci.codenvy-dev.com/jenkins/job/che-pullrequests-build/1299/ to view the results.

*
* @param namespace
* snapshot namespace(e.g. owner).
* @param workspaceId
* workspace specified in desired snapshot, optional
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@skabashnyuk
Copy link
Contributor

Other ok

@skabashnyuk skabashnyuk added status/in-progress This issue has been taken by an engineer and is under active development. and removed status/in-progress This issue has been taken by an engineer and is under active development. labels Jul 26, 2016
@sleshchenko
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@codenvy-ci
Copy link

Build # 1305 - FAILED

Please check console output at http://ci.codenvy-dev.com/jenkins/job/che-pullrequests-build/1305/ to view the results.

@voievodin voievodin merged commit 7d61a81 into jpa-integration Jul 26, 2016
@voievodin voievodin deleted the snapshot-jpa branch July 26, 2016 09:00
@TylerJewell TylerJewell modified the milestone: 4.6.0 Jul 26, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants