You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Hi,
I am currently struggling for reading a mixed parameter grib file which contains (among others) temperature parameter ('t') at 100m and 200m. I would like these to be read in separated datasets, but it seems that the cfgrib.open_datasets() method automatically merge the record into the heightAboveLevel dimension (see example below).
Is there a workaround to read all grib record independantly and create one dataset for each, letting enduser merge the datasets by himself ?
Describe the solution you'd like
use level filtering key to create separated datasets
make the squeeze=False option working for this
add new method or option to read all records without merging
Describe alternatives you've considered
I have tried to include the level keys for making separated datasets, but the levels are merged anyway into the same variable :
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Hi,
I am currently struggling for reading a mixed parameter grib file which contains (among others) temperature parameter ('t') at 100m and 200m. I would like these to be read in separated datasets, but it seems that the cfgrib.open_datasets() method automatically merge the record into the
heightAboveLevel
dimension (see example below).Is there a workaround to read all grib record independantly and create one dataset for each, letting enduser merge the datasets by himself ?
Describe the solution you'd like
Describe alternatives you've considered
I have tried to include the level keys for making separated datasets, but the levels are merged anyway into the same variable :
Additional context
No response
Organisation
Weathernews
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: