fix: show ts error on loadFile

[fengmk2]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Improved error handling for file loading to provide better error visibility and logging.
  • Enhanced error message construction to include more context when file loading fails.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes focus on improving error handling in the loadFile method within the src/utils/index.ts file. The enhancement introduces a more comprehensive approach to error logging, specifically adding a conditional block to handle errors that might not have a clear message. This modification aims to provide better visibility into error scenarios, particularly those related to TypeScript errors, by using console.trace() for additional debugging information.

Changes

File	Change Summary
src/utils/index.ts	Enhanced error handling in loadFile method: - Added conditional check for errors without a message - Implemented console.trace(e) for detailed error logging - Maintained existing error message construction logic

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of code so bright,
Errors traced with newfound might!
Logging mysteries, layer by layer,
TypeScript whispers, no longer a player
Debug's light shines crystal clear 🔍

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 82ef277 and 86393cc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/utils/index.ts (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/utils/index.ts (1)

87-91: Ensure consistent logging for unrecognized error objects

This change gracefully handles errors without a message property by using console.trace(e) and rethrowing. It effectively aids debugging TypeScript issues and other rare error scenarios. However, consider these improvements:

• Use instanceof Error to further verify the error context.
• Avoid inadvertently logging potential sensitive data.
• Optionally, add a distinct log message to differentiate these cases from those with valid e.message.

Add or expand test coverage to confirm that errors without message or typed as string are logged and handled as intended.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[pkg-pr-new]

Open in Stackblitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/eggjs/core/@eggjs/core@282

commit: 86393cc

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 20.00000% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 97.75%. Comparing base (2aeb0e2) to head (86393cc).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/utils/index.ts	20.00%	4 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #282      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.86%   97.75%   -0.12%     
==========================================
  Files          10       10              
  Lines        3373     3378       +5     
  Branches      594      595       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         3301     3302       +1     
- Misses         72       76       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.