-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: expand register add loadUnit #251
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
plugin/controller/lib/ControllerRegister.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-7
: Summary: ControllerRegister interface successfully expanded with loadUnit feature.The changes in this file effectively implement the PR objective of expanding the register functionality to add a loadUnit feature. The modifications are minimal yet impactful:
- The
LoadUnit
type is imported from '@eggjs/tegg-metadata'.- The
register
method in theControllerRegister
interface now includes an optionalloadUnit
parameter.These changes enhance the flexibility of the registration process while maintaining backwards compatibility. The optional nature of the new parameter allows for gradual adoption of the new functionality across the codebase.
To ensure a smooth integration:
- Update any existing implementations of
ControllerRegister
to handle the new optional parameter.- Review and update documentation to reflect this new capability.
- Consider adding tests that cover both the existing functionality and the new loadUnit feature.
As this change expands the capabilities of a core interface, consider the following architectural implications:
- Ensure that all implementations of
ControllerRegister
are updated to handle the new parameter consistently.- Review the overall design to confirm that this change aligns with the broader architectural goals of the project.
- Consider if this change might impact performance or introduce any new dependencies that need to be managed.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- plugin/controller/lib/AppLoadUnitControllerHook.ts (1 hunks)
- plugin/controller/lib/ControllerRegister.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
plugin/controller/lib/ControllerRegister.ts (1)
1-1
: LGTM: Import statement for LoadUnit added.The import of
LoadUnit
from '@eggjs/tegg-metadata' is correctly added to support the interface changes.plugin/controller/lib/AppLoadUnitControllerHook.ts (1)
28-28
: LGTM. Verify impact and update documentation.The change to include the
obj
parameter in theregister.register()
call aligns with the updatedControllerRegister
interface. This enhancement allows for more context during the registration process.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues:
- Verify that all implementations of
ControllerRegister
have been updated to handle the new optionalloadUnit
parameter.- Check if any existing calls to
register.register()
in other parts of the codebase need to be updated.Run the following script to find all implementations and usages of the
register
method:Consider updating the documentation for the
AppLoadUnitControllerHook
class and thepostCreate
method to reflect this change in functionality.✅ Verification successful
Verified: The change to include the
obj
parameter in theregister.register()
call is consistent and does not introduce any issues.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all implementations of ControllerRegister interface echo "ControllerRegister implementations:" ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements ControllerRegister' # Find all usages of register method echo "\nregister method usages:" rg -A 5 'register\s*\('Length of output: 9838
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
3.49.0 |
Checklist
npm test
passesAffected core subsystem(s)
Description of change
Summary by CodeRabbit