Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: expand register add loadUnit #251

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2024
Merged

feat: expand register add loadUnit #251

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2024

Conversation

akitaSummer
Copy link
Contributor

@akitaSummer akitaSummer commented Oct 21, 2024

Checklist
  • npm test passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)
Description of change

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced registration process with the ability to include an optional LoadUnit instance.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved method signatures for better clarity and functionality in registration methods.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the postCreate method in the AppLoadUnitControllerHook class and the register method in the ControllerRegister interface. The postCreate method now accepts an additional argument, obj, which is passed to the register method. Consequently, the register method's signature has been updated to accept two parameters: rootProtoManager and an optional loadUnit. These adjustments enhance the interaction between the registration process and the LoadUnit instance.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
plugin/controller/lib/AppLoadUnitControllerHook.ts Updated postCreate method to accept an additional parameter, obj, and modified the call to the register method.
plugin/controller/lib/ControllerRegister.ts Modified register method signature to accept an optional loadUnit parameter in addition to rootProtoManager.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix: add preload loadunit #236: The changes in the ControllerRegister interface to accept an optional LoadUnit parameter are directly related to the modifications in the postCreate method of the AppLoadUnitControllerHook class, which now passes a LoadUnit instance to the register method.

Suggested reviewers

  • killagu

Poem

In the garden where changes bloom,
The postCreate finds more room.
With loadUnit now in tow,
Together, they make the process flow.
Hops of joy for code so bright,
A dance of logic, pure delight! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
plugin/controller/lib/ControllerRegister.ts (1)

Line range hint 1-7: Summary: ControllerRegister interface successfully expanded with loadUnit feature.

The changes in this file effectively implement the PR objective of expanding the register functionality to add a loadUnit feature. The modifications are minimal yet impactful:

  1. The LoadUnit type is imported from '@eggjs/tegg-metadata'.
  2. The register method in the ControllerRegister interface now includes an optional loadUnit parameter.

These changes enhance the flexibility of the registration process while maintaining backwards compatibility. The optional nature of the new parameter allows for gradual adoption of the new functionality across the codebase.

To ensure a smooth integration:

  1. Update any existing implementations of ControllerRegister to handle the new optional parameter.
  2. Review and update documentation to reflect this new capability.
  3. Consider adding tests that cover both the existing functionality and the new loadUnit feature.

As this change expands the capabilities of a core interface, consider the following architectural implications:

  1. Ensure that all implementations of ControllerRegister are updated to handle the new parameter consistently.
  2. Review the overall design to confirm that this change aligns with the broader architectural goals of the project.
  3. Consider if this change might impact performance or introduce any new dependencies that need to be managed.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e94c045 and 3158854.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • plugin/controller/lib/AppLoadUnitControllerHook.ts (1 hunks)
  • plugin/controller/lib/ControllerRegister.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
plugin/controller/lib/ControllerRegister.ts (1)

1-1: LGTM: Import statement for LoadUnit added.

The import of LoadUnit from '@eggjs/tegg-metadata' is correctly added to support the interface changes.

plugin/controller/lib/AppLoadUnitControllerHook.ts (1)

28-28: LGTM. Verify impact and update documentation.

The change to include the obj parameter in the register.register() call aligns with the updated ControllerRegister interface. This enhancement allows for more context during the registration process.

To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues:

  1. Verify that all implementations of ControllerRegister have been updated to handle the new optional loadUnit parameter.
  2. Check if any existing calls to register.register() in other parts of the codebase need to be updated.

Run the following script to find all implementations and usages of the register method:

Consider updating the documentation for the AppLoadUnitControllerHook class and the postCreate method to reflect this change in functionality.

✅ Verification successful

Verified: The change to include the obj parameter in the register.register() call is consistent and does not introduce any issues.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all implementations of ControllerRegister interface
echo "ControllerRegister implementations:"
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements ControllerRegister'

# Find all usages of register method
echo "\nregister method usages:"
rg -A 5 'register\s*\('

Length of output: 9838

plugin/controller/lib/ControllerRegister.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@killagu killagu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@killagu killagu merged commit 8a1649d into master Oct 21, 2024
12 checks passed
@killagu killagu deleted the feat/expand-register branch October 21, 2024 05:10
@killagu
Copy link
Contributor

killagu commented Oct 21, 2024

3.49.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants