fix: import event source only default export #15
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces updates across multiple files in the Changes
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
commit: |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/lib/watcher.ts (1)
Line range hint
63-98: Critical: Commented out unwatch functionality needs proper trackingThe unwatch functionality has been commented out without proper tracking or documentation. This could lead to:
- Memory leaks if watchers are never cleaned up
- Unexpected behavior for users expecting unwatch functionality
- Potential resource leaks in long-running applications
Would you like me to:
- Create a GitHub issue to track the TODO for cluster-client unsubscribe implementation?
- Generate a temporary workaround that at least handles the listener cleanup portion?
In the meantime, please add a warning in the README about this limitation.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.github/workflows/nodejs.yml(1 hunks)README.md(3 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)src/lib/watcher.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- README.md
- package.json
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/lib/watcher.ts (1)
28-30: LGTM! Verify event source modules compatibility
The addition of importDefaultOnly: true aligns with the PR objective and ensures consistent module importing behavior.
Let's verify that all event source modules are compatible with default exports:
✅ Verification successful
Event source modules are compatible with default exports
The verification confirms that all event source modules (default.ts and development.ts) are using default exports correctly, making them compatible with the importDefaultOnly: true option. No conflicting named exports were found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all event source implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'export default class $_ extends BaseEventSource {
$$$
}'
# Also check for any other export patterns that might conflict
rg "^export \{" src/lib/event-sources/
Length of output: 7482
| @@ -11,6 +11,6 @@ jobs: | |||
| name: Node.js | |||
| uses: node-modules/github-actions/.github/workflows/node-test.yml@master | |||
| with: | |||
| version: '18.19.0, 18, 20, 22' | |||
| version: '18.19.0, 18, 20, 22, 23' | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Node.js 23 is not officially supported by the reusable workflow
The parent workflow (node-modules/github-actions/.github/workflows/node-test.yml) explicitly lists supported Node.js versions as "16, 18, 20, 22" in its default configuration. Adding Node.js 23 might lead to unexpected behavior since it's not part of the officially supported versions in the reusable workflow.
Consider:
- Removing Node.js 23 from the test matrix
- Or, open an issue/PR in the
node-modules/github-actionsrepository to add support for Node.js 23 first
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider the implications of testing against Node.js 23
Node.js 23 is a current release (not LTS) with a shorter support window. While testing against it provides early feedback, be aware that:
- It may contain breaking changes or experimental features
- It has a shorter support lifecycle compared to LTS versions
Let's verify the parent workflow's compatibility:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the reusable workflow supports Node.js 23
# Expected: The workflow should explicitly list supported Node.js versions
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/node-modules/github-actions/master/.github/workflows/node-test.yml | grep -A 5 "version:"
Length of output: 842
[skip ci] ## [4.0.1](v4.0.0...v4.0.1) (2024-12-20) ### Bug Fixes * import event source only default export ([#15](#15)) ([5c52c49](5c52c49))
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Chores
package.jsonfile for rebranding purposes.Bug Fixes