You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Code Charts
The evidence submitted by China [IRGN1519]
The pronunciation is jie2, and the corresponding traditional form is U+28942(𨥂), so the phonetic element, the right component must be 孑 not 子.
I think it's not better to change the glyph at present, and we can treat U+2B4E6 as the simplified form of 釨. 𫓦 is not included in GZFY, so maybe we need to change the G ref. to G9-9838E136 or others, and China, UTC or UK should submit the real ⿰钅孑 to IRG in future.
Note that the 9838E136 glyph in the new version of GB 18030 should follow the G glyph in the code charts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Code Charts
The evidence submitted by China [IRGN1519]
The pronunciation is jie2, and the corresponding traditional form is U+28942(𨥂), so the phonetic element, the right component must be 孑 not 子.
I think it's not better to change the glyph at present, and we can treat U+2B4E6 as the simplified form of 釨. 𫓦 is not included in GZFY, so maybe we need to change the G ref. to G9-9838E136 or others, and China, UTC or UK should submit the real ⿰钅孑 to IRG in future.
Note that the 9838E136 glyph in the new version of GB 18030 should follow the G glyph in the code charts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: