You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For file/large byte data we have fields for various popular hashing algorithms: md5, sha256, etc. While I'd want to keep entity-specific hashing algorithms isolated to field sets related to them (imphash to PE, ja3 to TLS, etc.), I think it would be worthwhile to add some standardized fuzzy byte hashes to hash. Specifically I think we could start with something like ssdeep. If there are others that folks think are worthwhile, we could likely add them at the same time.
Motivation:
Fuzzy hashes would allow us to group by similar entities rather than identical. Helpful for things like similar file identification, etc.
Summary
For file/large byte data we have fields for various popular hashing algorithms:
md5
,sha256
, etc. While I'd want to keep entity-specific hashing algorithms isolated to field sets related to them (imphash
to PE,ja3
to TLS, etc.), I think it would be worthwhile to add some standardized fuzzy byte hashes tohash
. Specifically I think we could start with something likessdeep
. If there are others that folks think are worthwhile, we could likely add them at the same time.Motivation:
Fuzzy hashes would allow us to group by similar entities rather than identical. Helpful for things like similar file identification, etc.
Detailed Design:
New fields:
hash.ssdeep
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: