Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Firewall Integrations | Support Additional Syslog Formats #4077

Open
4 tasks
ebeahan opened this issue Aug 26, 2022 · 3 comments
Open
4 tasks

Firewall Integrations | Support Additional Syslog Formats #4077

ebeahan opened this issue Aug 26, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
Stalled Team:Security-Deployment and Devices Deployment and Devices Security team [elastic/sec-deployment-and-devices]

Comments

@ebeahan
Copy link
Member

ebeahan commented Aug 26, 2022

Continuing the work started in #3377

Address these firewall integrations to ensure each is consistent in the syslog formats supported.

Fortinet
Syslog configuration now includes the option to enable RFC5424 format. Docs here.

  • RFC5424

Juniper SRX

  • RFC3164

Sophos XG
Device Standard Format isn't a standard syslog format according to their docs. Fine to limit our support to Central Reporting Format.

  • RFC3164
  • RFC5424
@elasticmachine
Copy link

Pinging @elastic/security-external-integrations (Team:Security-External Integrations)

@botelastic
Copy link

botelastic bot commented Aug 26, 2023

Hi! We just realized that we haven't looked into this issue in a while. We're sorry! We're labeling this issue as Stale to make it hit our filters and make sure we get back to it as soon as possible. In the meantime, it'd be extremely helpful if you could take a look at it as well and confirm its relevance. A simple comment with a nice emoji will be enough :+1. Thank you for your contribution!

@botelastic botelastic bot added the Stalled label Aug 26, 2023
@narph narph added Team:Security-Deployment and Devices Deployment and Devices Security team [elastic/sec-deployment-and-devices] and removed Team:Security-External Integrations labels Jan 29, 2024
@botelastic botelastic bot removed the Stalled label Jan 29, 2024
@botelastic
Copy link

botelastic bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Hi! We just realized that we haven't looked into this issue in a while. We're sorry! We're labeling this issue as Stale to make it hit our filters and make sure we get back to it as soon as possible. In the meantime, it'd be extremely helpful if you could take a look at it as well and confirm its relevance. A simple comment with a nice emoji will be enough :+1. Thank you for your contribution!

@botelastic botelastic bot added the Stalled label Jan 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Stalled Team:Security-Deployment and Devices Deployment and Devices Security team [elastic/sec-deployment-and-devices]
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants