Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ML] Improve UX regarding df analytics model memory limit #43740

Closed
przemekwitek opened this issue Aug 22, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

[ML] Improve UX regarding df analytics model memory limit #43740

przemekwitek opened this issue Aug 22, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@przemekwitek
Copy link
Contributor

When the user is about to create df analytics job, the DataFrameAnalyticsConfig.model_memory_limit field should be auto-populated if the user did not provide any value for this field.
More specifically:

  1. _ml/data_frame/analytics/_estimate_memory_usage API endpoint should be called
  2. response.expected_memory_without_disk (this may change in future releases) value should be copied to DataFrameAnalyticsConfig.model_memory_limit (with some safety margin applied)
  3. If the endpoint is unavailable or the request fails, some constant default value may be put into model_memory_limit (e.g. 200MB)

Umbrella issue: elastic/elasticsearch#44699

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/ml-ui

@walterra walterra removed the v8.0.0 label Aug 22, 2019
@peteharverson peteharverson changed the title Improve UX regarding df analytics model memory limit [ML] Improve UX regarding df analytics model memory limit Aug 27, 2019
@peteharverson
Copy link
Contributor

For 7.4 the default model memory limit is set to 50MB and the setting is editable in the advanced editor.

For 7.5 we should look to auto-populate the model_memory_limit setting with the value obtained from the _ml/data_frame/analytics/_estimate_memory_usage API endpoint.

@alvarezmelissa87
Copy link
Contributor

Closed via #50714

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants