-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Discuss][Data Views] Field popularity performance improvement #52318
Comments
Pinging @elastic/kibana-app (Team:KibanaApp) |
Pinging @elastic/kibana-app-arch (Team:AppArch) |
++ I think this is a great way to minimize confusion while we sort out a longer-term strategy.
In the past we have discussed the idea of a more thorough "field statistics" service offered as a part of index patterns. AFAIK the design of such a service hasn't been discussed in much detail yet, but presumably would replace the existing Also FWIW, field popularity feels thematically related to the long-standing discussion around usage metrics in Kibana. If a feature like that were eventually implemented, then we could consider rolling field popularity tracking into it as another option. (If it is, in fact, something that users want/need). |
Pinging @elastic/kibana-data-discovery (Team:DataDiscovery) |
I recently noticed that when authoring runtime fields and having discover open in another tab, saving runtime fields would occasionally fail and require a refresh, because the index pattern is out of sync. This explains why this happens. Probably worth considering that usecase as well when thinking of a solution. |
Closing this because it's not planned to be resolved in the foreseeable future. It will be tracked in our Icebox and will be re-opened if our priorities change. Feel free to re-open if you think it should be melted sooner. |
Index Pattern service discussion mentions that field popularity (or "count") is used only in Discover:
Now index pattern is saved every time a user does some field related operation in Discover. Like pressing the "add" or "remove" button on the field. Customer has suggested to improve how field popularity is tracked:
What do we want to do about field popularity?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: