Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ecl_run depends on Resdata to be able to make summary objects #6928

Closed
berland opened this issue Jan 12, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #6930
Closed

ecl_run depends on Resdata to be able to make summary objects #6928

berland opened this issue Jan 12, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #6930
Labels

Comments

@berland
Copy link
Contributor

berland commented Jan 12, 2024

This line exposes the Eclipse100 job to bugs in resdata for MPI runs.

For the user, a crash in this code looks like Eclipse100 itself has crashed, while it hasn't.

@berland
Copy link
Contributor Author

berland commented Jan 12, 2024

The crash can be reproduced with

summary.x XXX_PRED-0.UNSMRY

on the finished file produced in the asset. This implies a follow-up bug in resdata as this summary file is not readable by subsequent forward models.

@xjules xjules moved this from Todo to Ready for Review in SCOUT Jan 12, 2024
@eivindjahren
Copy link
Contributor

We looked at this together, and it seems like resdata crashes on the first report step. One unusual thing about the summary file is that the seqhdr is negative and ministeps don't start from 0.

@berland
Copy link
Contributor Author

berland commented Jan 12, 2024

Underlying bug in resdata: equinor/resdata#945

@berland
Copy link
Contributor Author

berland commented Jan 12, 2024

We looked at this together, and it seems like resdata crashes on the first report step. One unusual thing about the summary file is that the seqhdr is negative and ministeps don't start from 0.

Checked a smry file from Eclipse 2021, and it has the same properties with respect to seqhdr and ministeps but there is no crash.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Ready for Review to Done in SCOUT Jan 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants