Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Let's operate as if "In a world without the EF" #32

Open
MadeofTin opened this issue Mar 22, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Let's operate as if "In a world without the EF" #32

MadeofTin opened this issue Mar 22, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
Misc. Misc.

Comments

@MadeofTin
Copy link

There was a very long discussion today in the telegram group. One topic that came up often was the EFs possible roles.

Big things I took from the conversation.

  • The EF already has funds giving them more is not going to change the status quo
  • Granting is hard and slow.
  • Before any funds are given to the EF a full audit and transparency plan is recommended

My take is that we work as if there wasn't an EF to prepare for a world where there isn't an EF.

Lane 🧘‍♂️, [21.03.19 14:50]
I think I’ve said this publicly a few times already. I won’t support any initiative that hands additional funding to EF. In my mind, one of the main purposes - perhaps the main purpose - of this initiative is to de-centralize funding out of the hands of a single, largely unaccountable organization. EF is not designed to be, and does not intend to be, around forever.

Ameen Soleimani, [21.03.19 14:50]
.., the main purpose is to fund devs

Lane 🧘‍♂️, [21.03.19 14:50]
Sustainably, with transparency and accountability.

Hudson Jameson, [21.03.19 15:36]
As someone who has been at the EF since 2016, I would say that if the EF gets any more funds I would highly recommend an external audit of their current spending/finances/decision making and a requirement for full transparency before they get a dime.

@MadeofTin MadeofTin changed the title Let's operate as "In a world without the EF" Let's operate as if "In a world without the EF" Mar 22, 2019
@lrettig
Copy link
Collaborator

lrettig commented Mar 22, 2019

Clearly I agree, but to play devil's advocate and bring up the other side: as Ameen said yesterday, there's a question of bootstrapping trust. "No one" knows who you or I am, but everyone knows EF. Say what you will about EF, they have "not acted maliciously" with the existing funding.

My response to this is to start incrementally, act with right intent and with complete transparency, be very clear about everything that we are doing and why, and build trust over time. I also think we can "bootstrap" trust via trusted individuals rather than via an existing institution such as EF. To be clear, I trust many individuals within EF, but I do not think EF itself is the right entity to manage this (or else it would already have happened).

@pet3r-pan pet3r-pan added the Misc. Misc. label Apr 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Misc. Misc.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants