EIP-1996: Holdable token

[daniel-iobuilders]

An extension to the ERC-20 standard token that allows tokens to be put on hold. This guarantees a future transfer and makes the held tokens unavailable for transfer in the mean time. Holds are similar to escrows in that are firm and lead to final settlement.

A hold specifies a payer, a payee, a maximum amount, a notary and an expiration time. When the hold is created, the specified token balance from the payer is put on hold. A held balance cannot be transferred until the hold is either executed or released. The hold can only be executed by the notary, which triggers the transfer of the tokens from the payer to the payee. If a hold is released, either by the notary at any time, or by anyone after the expiration, no transfer is carried out and the amount is available again for the payer.

The corresponding PR can be found here: #1996

[github-actions]

There has been no activity on this issue for two months. It will be closed in a week if no further activity occurs. If you would like to move this EIP forward, please respond to any outstanding feedback or add a comment indicating that you have addressed all required feedback and are ready for a review.

[github-actions]

This issue was closed due to inactivity. If you are still pursuing it, feel free to reopen it and respond to any feedback or request a review in a comment.

[radeksvarz]

This EIP is stagnant - did the implementation get any traction?

[Pandapip1]

This EIP is stagnant - did the implementation get any traction?

Stagnant EIPs are EIPs where the authors went AWOL. If you would like to champion the EIP, you can submit a PR adding yourself as an author.

[radeksvarz]

Thanks for the reply - I am not interested to champion that, however would like to have the place for long term on going discussion.

The discussion link from EIP page directs here (and not to https://ethereum-magicians.org/ ).

That confuses when someone wants to consider all possible ERC20 extensions.

PS - this is very common as I went through tens of EIP standards - would like to see a common approach on the discussions wrt stagnant EIPs.