Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

the relevance of the sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable #494

Closed
MattUebel opened this issue Sep 2, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #495
Closed

the relevance of the sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable #494

MattUebel opened this issue Sep 2, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #495
Labels
kind/content kind/documentation

Comments

@MattUebel
Copy link
Contributor

👋 I've found net.core.bpf_jit_enable to be critical to falco's performance when running as a daemonset in large k8s clusters.

I've been unable to find this documented anywhere, in the repo or the docs site.
image

I came across this sysctl while reading into the sysdig documentation

More context in falcosecurity/falco#1710
@leogr leogr transferred this issue from falcosecurity/falco Sep 6, 2021
@poiana poiana removed the needs-kind label Sep 6, 2021
@ghost ghost mentioned this issue Sep 10, 2021
Merged
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 10, 2021

Since I was editing the docs for another issue I took a stab at writing the eBPF jit note. Reviews appreciated :)

@MattUebel
Copy link
Contributor Author

nice standout red box, I like it!
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
kind/content kind/documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

docs: add performance note for eBPF in install instructions
3 participants
@MattUebel @leogr @poiana