Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create Admin Term/DSP page #2482

Closed
4 tasks done
Tracked by #139 ...
llienfec opened this issue Oct 30, 2018 · 12 comments
Closed
4 tasks done
Tracked by #139 ...

Create Admin Term/DSP page #2482

llienfec opened this issue Oct 30, 2018 · 12 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@llienfec
Copy link
Contributor

llienfec commented Oct 30, 2018

We need to put Administrative Terminations (ATs) and Debt Settlement Plans (DSPs) from the 2016 election cycle to present on the website so that committees, the public, and researchers can find information about these decisions. This project supports work from RAD, CAT, and Admin Law.

Pre-work:

  • OGC will compile redacted documents.
  • RAD will create the suggested chart in Word or Excel.
  • Both groups will approve any explanatory or intro language on the page.

To do:

  • RAD/OGC complete preparation of documents to be published.
  • Decide on a template for the page.
  • Decide where to host the the page.
  • Groom implementation ticket based on initial work here.

Future work
Implementation ticket: #3213

@llienfec
Copy link
Contributor Author

For the charts, we suggest using the E&J format:

  • Use the resource template
  • Section headings should be Administrative Terminations and Debt Settlement Plans
  • When coding the charts, use the table class simple-table, be sure to use percents for column widths

@AmyKort AmyKort added this to the Sprint 7.6 milestone Nov 7, 2018
@AmyKort AmyKort removed this from the Sprint 7.6 milestone Nov 23, 2018
@bmathesonFEC bmathesonFEC self-assigned this Oct 1, 2019
@bmathesonFEC bmathesonFEC added this to the Sprint 10.2 milestone Oct 1, 2019
@bmathesonFEC
Copy link
Contributor

Picking up where Lauren left off with this ticket. I modified the completion criteria to make this an "decisions" ticket while RAD/OGC finalize the documents. Created an implementation ticket to execute these decisions once materials are ready.

@bmathesonFEC
Copy link
Contributor

bmathesonFEC commented Oct 1, 2019

Re: page type:

Suggestion 1: Use the E&J pages as a template. (These are kind of our template for "legal resource archives.") https://www.fec.gov/legal-resources/regulations/explanations-and-justifications/chronological-index-2010-2019-ejs/#2019

Suggestion 2: Use the Webinar materials resource page:
https://fec-prod-proxy.app.cloud.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/trainings/webinar-materials/

@bmathesonFEC
Copy link
Contributor

bmathesonFEC commented Oct 1, 2019

Re: page location

Suggestion: Page should live at Legal resources > Policy & other guidance as one of the subcategories of the page:

  • Requests for Comment
  • Proposals Under Consideration
  • Policy Statements
  • Requests for Legal Consideration by Commission
  • Interpretive Rules
  • Rules of Agency Organization Procedure, or Practice
  • Administrative Termination and Debt Settlement Documents
  • Other Guidance

Below, in the Administrative Termination and Debt Settlement Documents section of the page, provide the following:

@bmathesonFEC
Copy link
Contributor

Re: page type

Decided on a resource page with two categories on the left for each of the two lists, AT and DSP, within each list there will be specific committee maters using a Document List to display the docs for download. Considering the documents listed

image

@bmathesonFEC
Copy link
Contributor

Re: page location:

Summarizing suggestions for locations:

This content is an unnatural fit for pages on the current site because each document references a specific committee, but we're not going to list these documents on the committee's page -- for now -- in the same way we don't link to a closed MUR from the committee page. Alternatively, Policy and Other Guidance and Documents on Enforcement Compliance Practices are both home to policy documents NOT the documents produced by those policies.

A possible content analogy is the "Program for Requesting Consideration of Legal Questions by the Commission" on the Policy and Other Guidance page. This subheading of the Policy and Other Guidance page includes a link to "Browse Previous Requests" That page links to a separate transition page with a table showing each request that has been made under the policy.

@AmyKort @dorothyyeager @JonellaCulmer I propose that we move forward with an approach that puts this content on the Policy and Other Guidance page for now based on my perception that this content is most similar to the Legal Consideration section. Two positives about this approach:

  • we have a 10.6 ticket (Prepare for migrating the policy page to Wagtail #3220) queued up to take the Policy and Other Guidance page and convert it to a resource page before taking it off of transition. I can add a note to that ticket that we should reassess whether AT/DSP should be housed on that new resources page at that time.
  • this is a completely new page so we don't have a materials that reference this page, nor do we have a chain of redirects to put into place if we decide to move it somewhere else on the site.

I don't want to kick the can down the road if you think this content absolutely doesn't fit on Policy and Other Guidance. Let me know what you think.

@dorothyyeager
Copy link
Contributor

I'm between the policy page, for the reasons @bmathesonFEC mentions, and the data page, because this new page relates to a filing by a candidate.

Another idea that just occurred to me - could this page work as a child page of the H4CC page on terminating a committee? That page explains the administrative termination process. (A content analogy could be the coordinated party expenditure pages, where we have one page that explains the law and one page that has the limits for the year.)

https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/terminating-a-committee/

@bmathesonFEC
Copy link
Contributor

@dorothyyeager I'm not a fan of putting this under H4CC because there are only a small subset of ATs and DSPs that get referred to the Commission. Most are completed uneventfully when they fall within thresholds specified in RAD Procedures. I think it would be misleading to visitors of the site if they reviewed one of these memorandums.

Re: data page. I agree that it would be ideal to go a committee's page and see their AT or DSP memo to find out why they're terminated, but I think that's a huge lift relative to the expected traffic to see these documents and our competing priorities.

@AmyKort I'm looking over the Documents for Enforcement and Compliance Practices page and it starts out:

Following oversight hearings on November 3, 2011 before the Subcommittee on Elections of the House of Representatives Committee on House Administration, the Commission released a number of documents relating to the enforcement and compliance processes.The Commission has worked to further transparency and is pleased to advance this agency goal by making these internal documents available to the public. The documents, which can be found at the links below, fall into three categories:

Since AT / DSP referral docs aren't part of the 2011 oversight subcommittee release, I suggest that we don't put AT/DSP on that page, unless we want to reword the intro altogether.

I'm still team POG (I'm going to use this for Policy and Other Guidance from now on).

@AmyKort
Copy link

AmyKort commented Oct 7, 2019

How about we make it a subhead under "Other Guidance," rather than it's own heading on the Policy page?

@dorothyyeager
Copy link
Contributor

That's good to know, @bmathesonFEC so I agree, H4CC or Data is not a good fit.

@AmyKort
Copy link

AmyKort commented Oct 7, 2019

. . . because (and I know I am splitting hairs) it is not a policy statement or an interpretive rule. But it is a form of other guidance.

@bmathesonFEC
Copy link
Contributor

Final location on the site:
Policy Statements, Interpretive Rules and Other Guidance

  • Requests for Comment
  • Proposals Under Consideration
  • Policy Statements
    -Requests for Legal Consideration by Commission
  • Interpretive Rules
  • Rules of Agency Organization Procedure, or Practice
  • Other Guidance
    -Administrative Termination and Debt Settlement Documents

I'll make a note in the 10.6 Policy and Other Guidance that we should re-assess this as an appropriate home for this content.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants