Copr-release + Use single-digit package versioning

[praiskup]

What do you think about having just single-digit versions?

Currently, we have two-digit versions (some are 3-digits by mistake), major.minor but we never actually bumped major which leads to a ridiculous version like:

copr-backend    1.173
copr-frontend   1.202
copr-common     0.21.1
...

My bet that the 0 -> 1 bump in backend/frontend/etc.` was only done to not go 0ver.

What I propose is to use 1 -> 2 -> ... -> inf.

[FrostyX]

I am bumping up the priority for this issue. Not because of the single-digit versioning but because we need to do a new release soon. I already hotfixed a few issues in production.

[FrostyX]

The release fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2291505 and maybe other Bugzilla. We shouldn't forget to mention them in the Bodhi update.

[nikromen]

openmandriva fails but this is known issue -> rpm-software-management/mock#1066

[praiskup]

We re-discussed this today, and the idea was to do major bump everywhere right now, to avoid 0ver, and to shorten the versions from 3 digits to two.