-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Removal of notaries from the FIL+ Program]Abusive Behaviour Detected on 2008 - PikNik #946
Comments
I really can’t wait to get my holiday invitations to come spend time with you guys but shall we get back on topic? No need to worry, in my place of the world everyone has a right to speak. The people even use real names, makes it much more comfortable….. Regarding the complaint itself it is already answer by the filcoinplus governance team |
This is a typical case of a notary IGNORING the opinions of community members to force signatures. This type of behavior is exactly what the community is cracking down on these days. @cryptowhizzard you haven't signed it, don't come interfering. |
2008 is my own application, notary rules state that you can’t sign your own applications. Again, the governance team already responded to the claim and decided that it was ok to move on. See here: #935 (comment) |
@cryptowhizzard Before this flag is reasonably explained, PikNik's forced signing is clearly an abuse. This is the common rule of the community. |
No
No, there is nothing like this.
It was already explained. |
With all due respect, the fact that more than 51% of notaries were unwilling to sign it for you is in itself an indication that the application was highly controversial. The Notary willing to take the risk of signing were naturally suspected of obtaining an undue commitment.The charges against piknik are well understandable. In the community, we should respect consensus. You should learn to convince the other notaries, not threaten them by pressuring KevinZ on slack. |
In addition, the @Filplus-govteam account only represents the role of the public proposer from PL and can not represent the consensus of the community. |
As you mentioned earlier, having lunch or dinner together can earn your recognition; Did the notary also accept your bribe, so he took the risk of signing for you. |
Exposing a suspicious interaction between them: filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets#388 |
Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation and emotional abuse in which one person seeks to make another doubt their own perceptions, memory, judgment, or sanity. The term "gaslighting" originated from a play called "Gas Light" and later adapted into movies, where a husband manipulates his wife into believing she is going insane by dimming the gas lights in their home and then denying that the lights have changed when she mentions it. In interpersonal relationships, gaslighting typically involves a pattern of behavior by the gaslighter that aims to undermine the victim's confidence and sense of reality. Some common tactics used in gaslighting include:
|
Closed for spamming and gaslighting bas on aforementioned evidence and lack of objective or useful arguments |
Who is gaslighting whom here? |
That's what I'm wondering. |
KYCing new github account for LDN applications is one thing, I get that. OP posted a valid technical governance question and immediately get blamed on because the account is new? Not cool. |
Issue Description
@jamerduhgamer from PikNik signed this abusive application, Ignoring warnings from community members!
filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets#2008
1、too much duplicate data
2、CID sharing within totally different datasets.
Proposed Solution(s)
Requesting immediate removal of abusive notaries who are involved in this application---PikNik (may be more)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: