Code Quality: Rename "Files.App (Package)" to "Files.Package" in the directory tree

[Lamparter]

Description

It's unnecessary and somewhat confusing to have the name "Files.App (Package)" in the directory tree (src). It should better be named Files.Package to match the configuration manager.

Concerned code

N/A

Gains

• Better understanding of folder structure
• Developer will understand the link between "Files.App (Package)" and "Files.Package" as it appears in the editor.

Requirements

• Rename directory "Files.App (Package)" to "Files.Package"

Comments

No response

[0x5bfa]

• moving appxmanifest to another place would break the auto update

[0x5bfa]

To rename, Files.App.Package makes more sense but we'd not rename or move until msixbundle is supported in the single packing project.

[Lamparter]

To rename, Files.App.Package makes more sense but we'd not rename or move until msixbundle is supported in the single packing project.

Yes you're right, like in FluentHub. However, that's how it currently is (Files.Package in Configuration Manager)

[yaira2]

#12475 (comment)

[Lamparter]

It's possible to publish a package from a single package project though, right?

I think it's like that in Rebound 11.

[yaira2]

Bundles aren't supported yet